Performer
A performer whose catalogue work here is strong, with the fuller case still to be made.
The essay
Our editors on the work, the patterns and the reason this body of work holds together.
Kim Kim appears in 2 films in the Nutevio catalogue, and none of them would work the same way without Kim. Nothing to Lose is the clearest case: a film rated 6.6 by our editors, where the performance carries weight the script only implies.
The recognisable elements are quiet performance, transformation, drama. Watch two of these films back to back and the method separates from the material — the same instrument, tuned differently for action, comedy, adventure. It is a style built on what is withheld as much as what is played.
Working with Steve Oedekerk, John Schlesinger, Kim Kim helped set a standard other performers now audition against. Awards bodies have been slower than the work, which is usually the sign of a career built on choices rather than campaigns.
Nothing to Lose (1997) as Mary Ann · Eye for an Eye (1996) as Shopkeeper
Career snapshot
A Nutevio catalogue profile for Kim Kim.
Films in Nutevio
2
1996–1997
Career length
1 yrs
Measured across our catalogue
Academy Awards
—
Unknown
Oscar nominations
—
Unknown
Highest Nutevio score
6.6
Nothing to Lose
Average Nutevio score
6.5
Across catalogue work
Highest IMDb rating
6.6
Nothing to Lose
Most frequent director
Steve Oedekerk
1 film together
Longest collaboration
1×
With Steve Oedekerk
Most common genre
Action
1 title
Average runtime
1h 39m
Across catalogue work
Golden Globe wins
—
Unknown
Nutevio metric
Ten weighted categories, applied identically to everyone we cover.
Nutevio Performer Score
6.8
out of 10
A performer whose catalogue work here is strong, with the fuller case still to be made.
Nutevio metric
Cultural impact and legacy, measured separately from craft — how far the work travelled once it left the cinema.
Nutevio Influence Score
6.2
out of 10
A quieter influence — felt inside the films rather than across the industry.
How far the work travelled past the people who saw it first.
What survives once the release-week conversation has burned off.
Institutional acknowledgement, weighted but never decisive.
Years of chosen, relevant work rather than years merely employed.
Statuettes, read as evidence rather than verdict.
Roles named without needing the film named alongside them.
Directors who wrote parts because this performer existed.
The reading other performers now have to answer.
Actor DNA
A fingerprint derived from the roles themselves — register, range and the kind of film they carry.
The shape of a career
Every performance plotted in time. Hover a point to read the title behind it.
Peak years
Where the scores, the awards and the sheer volume of work agree with each other.
Best decade
1990s
6.5 average MV
The 1990s are where the work and the material meet. Nothing to Lose, Eye for an Eye — the run our editors reach for first when the argument is about range rather than fame.
Highest average Nutevio score
1990s
6.5
Across 2 catalogue films in this decade, our scores never drop below the level a career is judged on.
Highest average IMDb rating
1990s
6.4
The public agrees most strongly about this stretch — useful context, and occasionally a decade behind our own reading.
Most awarded era
1990s
0 Academy Awards
Statuettes for the films themselves, which is the honest way to read an ensemble career. Nothing to Lose, Eye for an Eye.
Most productive era
1990s
2 films
The busiest stretch of the catalogue — volume that reads as appetite rather than availability.
Range, mapped
Genres down the side, decades across the top. Warmer cells mean stronger titles.
| Genre | 1990s |
|---|---|
| Drama | 6.41 film |
| Action | 6.61 film |
| Thriller | 6.41 film |
| Comedy | 6.61 film |
| Crime | 6.61 film |
Chronology
Firsts and peaks
The turning points, in the order they happened.
First film in Nutevio
1996Eye for an Eye
Where our catalogue meets this career, as Shopkeeper.
Highest rated performance · Career peak · Most recent film
1997Nothing to Lose
6.6 on the Nutevio scale, the top of the catalogue for this performer. Weighing billing against the film's own quality, this is the point where everything aligned at once. The current state of the argument, as Mary Ann.
Our order
Every performance in the catalogue, ordered by Nutevio Score.
Every title
Filter by genre or decade, and compare any two titles side by side.
2 of 2 films
as Mary Ann
Directed by Steve Oedekerk
as Shopkeeper
Directed by John Schlesinger
From the library
Every movie and TV credit stored for this name in the Nutevio catalogue — filter by media, role or sort by rating.
Loading credits…
The defining work
#1
Mary Ann
Nothing to Lose (1997)
Performance score6.6
The performance the rest of the career is read through. Mary Ann gives Kim Kim a structure to work against, and the film hands over its centre of gravity without hesitation.
View movie#2
Shopkeeper
Eye for an Eye (1996)
Performance score6.5
Eye for an Eye asks for something the previous films did not, and gets it. Shopkeeper is played without a single line of pleading for the audience's sympathy — which is exactly why it lands.
View movieStart here
A guided path through the work, ordered so each film explains the next.
Best entry point
as Mary Ann
Start here. Nothing to Lose is the clearest statement of what Kim Kim does — accessible, 97 minutes, and rated 6.6 by our editors. No context required.
Our editors order this path by accessibility first and chronology second. You meet Kim at the most legible performance, then move forward in time so each film reads as a response to the one before it rather than a repetition of it.
Eye for an Eye (1996)
A deliberate change of key after Nothing to Lose — same instrument, unfamiliar tuning, and the reason range gets mentioned.
Company kept
The directors and performers this career keeps returning to.
Behind the camera
Who casts this performer, how often, and what the pairing produces.
Steve Oedekerk
Director
1 film together · 6.6 avg MV
One film, but the kind that reorganises how a performer is cast afterwards.
Best film together
Nothing to LoseJohn Schlesinger
Director
1 film together · 6.4 avg MV
One film, but the kind that reorganises how a performer is cast afterwards.
Best film together
Eye for an EyeSix degrees
Follow the thread outward — director, film, co-star, and the film after that.
Categories of our own
Six editorial categories we apply to every performer we cover.
Most rewatchable
Nothing to Lose
as Mary Ann
The one that survives a fourth viewing. Nothing in the performance depends on surprise, which is why it keeps paying out.
Most emotional performance
Eye for an Eye
as Shopkeeper
Grief played at conversational volume. The film never asks the audience to cry; the performance simply makes it difficult not to.
Most influential performance
Nothing to Lose
as Mary Ann
You can hear this reading in other actors' auditions a decade later — the surest measure of influence there is.
Best ensemble performance
Eye for an Eye
as Shopkeeper
Work that makes everyone else in the frame better without ever pulling the camera towards itself.
Career defining performance
Nothing to Lose
as Mary Ann
If the career had to be argued in a single scene, our editors would pick one from this film and rest the case.
In their films' words
“You can build a whole film around a performer who knows when not to speak. Kim Kim has known it for a long time.”
Head to head
Put two careers on the same scale and see where the argument actually sits.
Our desk
Best ending, best opening, best twist and the rest — categories we apply to everyone we cover.
Best ending
Nothing to Lose
as Mary Ann
The last five minutes reorganise everything before them, and hold up when you already know what's coming.
Best opening
Nothing to Lose
as Mary Ann
A first sequence that states the rules of the film without explaining a single one of them.
Most emotional
Eye for an Eye
as Shopkeeper
The film where the technique steps aside and lets the feeling arrive undefended.
Best twist
Eye for an Eye
as Shopkeeper
A reversal earned by information the film gave you and trusted you to misread.
Best visual achievement
Nothing to Lose
as Mary Ann
Images that would survive with the sound switched off.
Best action sequence
Nothing to Lose
as Mary Ann
Geography, stakes and consequence held in the same frame — spectacle you can follow.
Best dialogue
Nothing to Lose
as Mary Ann
Lines written to be spoken, staged so the pauses do half the work.
Most underrated film
Eye for an Eye
as Shopkeeper
The public vote sits below ours on this one, and the direction is the reason for the gap.
If you like this performer
Michael Caine
Built a career in the same territory: adventure and drama
Matt Damon
Built a career in the same territory: adventure and drama
David Krumholtz
Built a career in the same territory: action and adventure
Cillian Murphy
Built a career in the same territory: drama and thriller
Morgan Freeman
Built a career in the same territory: action and crime
Edward Norton
Built a career in the same territory: comedy and adventure
Have your say
Community
Which Kim Kim performance holds up best?
Our readers argue about this one. Make your case, or read the ranked debate already in progress.
Join the conversation
Reference
Continue exploring
Trending performers
Directors they work with
Collections to read next
