Performer
A performer whose catalogue work here is strong, with the fuller case still to be made.
Nutevio rank
#230575
of 909177 performers
Top 50%
William Hudson works on quiet performance rather than volume, and the catalogue keeps proving that the quieter choice was the correct one.
The essay
Our editors on the work, the patterns and the reason this body of work holds together.
William Hudson appears in 4 films in the Nutevio catalogue, and none of them would work the same way without William. Mister Roberts is the clearest case: a film rated 6.7 by our editors, where the performance carries weight the script only implies.
The recognisable elements are quiet performance, drama, transformation. Watch two of these films back to back and the method separates from the material — the same instrument, tuned differently for science fiction, horror, drama. It is a style built on what is withheld as much as what is played.
Working with Nathan Juran, John Ford, Allan Dwan and others, William Hudson helped set a standard other performers now audition against. Awards bodies have been slower than the work, which is usually the sign of a career built on choices rather than campaigns.
Mister Roberts (1955) as Olson · Objective, Burma! (1945) as Fred Hollis · Sands of Iwo Jima (1950) as Marine (uncredited)
Career snapshot
Ranked #230575 of 909177 performers tracked in the Nutevio library.
Films in Nutevio
4
1945–1958
Career length
13 yrs
Measured across our catalogue
Academy Awards
—
Unknown
Oscar nominations
—
Unknown
Highest Nutevio score
6.7
Mister Roberts
Average Nutevio score
6.3
Across catalogue work
Highest IMDb rating
7.0
Mister Roberts
Most frequent director
Nathan Juran
1 film together
Longest collaboration
1×
With Nathan Juran
Most common genre
Drama
4 titles
Average runtime
1h 48m
Across catalogue work
Golden Globe wins
—
Unknown
Nutevio metric
Ten weighted categories, applied identically to everyone we cover.
Nutevio Performer Score
6.8
out of 10
A performer whose catalogue work here is strong, with the fuller case still to be made.
Nutevio metric
Cultural impact and legacy, measured separately from craft — how far the work travelled once it left the cinema.
Nutevio Influence Score
6.3
out of 10
A quieter influence — felt inside the films rather than across the industry.
How far the work travelled past the people who saw it first.
What survives once the release-week conversation has burned off.
Institutional acknowledgement, weighted but never decisive.
Years of chosen, relevant work rather than years merely employed.
Statuettes, read as evidence rather than verdict.
Roles named without needing the film named alongside them.
Directors who wrote parts because this performer existed.
The reading other performers now have to answer.
Actor DNA
A fingerprint derived from the roles themselves — register, range and the kind of film they carry.
The shape of a career
Every performance plotted in time. Hover a point to read the title behind it.
Peak years
Where the scores, the awards and the sheer volume of work agree with each other.
Best decade
1940s
6.6 average MV
The 1940s are where the work and the material meet. Objective, Burma! — the run our editors reach for first when the argument is about range rather than fame.
Highest average Nutevio score
1940s
6.6
Across 1 catalogue film in this decade, our scores never drop below the level a career is judged on.
Highest average IMDb rating
1940s
6.9
The public agrees most strongly about this stretch — useful context, and occasionally a decade behind our own reading.
Most awarded era
1940s
0 Academy Awards
Statuettes for the films themselves, which is the honest way to read an ensemble career. Objective, Burma!.
Most productive era
1950s
3 films
The busiest stretch of the catalogue — volume that reads as appetite rather than availability.
Range, mapped
Genres down the side, decades across the top. Warmer cells mean stronger titles.
| Genre | 1940s | 1950s |
|---|---|---|
| Drama | 6.61 film | 6.23 films |
| Action | 6.61 film | — |
| Comedy | — | 6.71 film |
| Horror | — | 5.51 film |
Chronology
Firsts and peaks
The turning points, in the order they happened.
First film in Nutevio · Career peak
Where our catalogue meets this career, as Fred Hollis. Weighing billing against the film's own quality, this is the point where everything aligned at once.
Highest rated performance
1955Mister Roberts
6.7 on the Nutevio scale, the top of the catalogue for this performer.
Most recent film
1958Attack of the 50 Foot Woman
The current state of the argument, as Harry Archer.
Our order
Every performance in the catalogue, ordered by Nutevio Score.
Every title
Filter by genre or decade, and compare any two titles side by side.
4 of 4 films
as Olson
Directed by John Ford
as Fred Hollis
Directed by Raoul Walsh
as Harry Archer
Directed by Nathan Juran
From the library
Every movie and TV credit stored for this name in the Nutevio catalogue — filter by media, role or sort by rating.
Loading credits…
The defining work
#1
Olson
Mister Roberts (1955)
Performance score6.6
The performance the rest of the career is read through. Olson gives William Hudson a structure to work against, and the film hands over its centre of gravity without hesitation.
View movie#2
Fred Hollis
Objective, Burma! (1945)
Performance score6.6
Objective, Burma! asks for something the previous films did not, and gets it. Fred Hollis is played without a single line of pleading for the audience's sympathy — which is exactly why it lands.
View movie#3
Harry Archer
Attack of the 50 Foot Woman (1958)
Performance score6.5
Attack of the 50 Foot Woman asks for something the previous films did not, and gets it. Harry Archer is played without a single line of pleading for the audience's sympathy — which is exactly why it lands.
View movie#4
Marine (uncredited)
Sands of Iwo Jima (1950)
Performance score6.5
Sands of Iwo Jima asks for something the previous films did not, and gets it. Marine (uncredited) is played without a single line of pleading for the audience's sympathy — which is exactly why it lands.
View movieStart here
A guided path through the work, ordered so each film explains the next.
Best entry point
as Olson
Start here. Mister Roberts is the clearest statement of what William Hudson does — accessible, 123 minutes, and rated 6.7 by our editors. No context required.
Our editors order this path by accessibility first and chronology second. You meet William at the most legible performance, then move forward in time so each film reads as a response to the one before it rather than a repetition of it.
Objective, Burma! (1945)
Keeps the war register of Mister Roberts but asks for a colder reading of it.
Sands of Iwo Jima (1950)
Keeps the war register of Objective, Burma! but asks for a colder reading of it.
Attack of the 50 Foot Woman (1958)
Keeps the drama register of Sands of Iwo Jima but asks for a colder reading of it.
Company kept
The directors and performers this career keeps returning to.
Raoul Walsh
Director
1 film together
Notably Objective, Burma!
Allan Dwan
Director
1 film together
Notably Sands of Iwo Jima
John Ford
Director
1 film together
Notably Mister Roberts
Nathan Juran
Director
1 film together
Notably Attack of the 50 Foot Woman
Behind the camera
Who casts this performer, how often, and what the pairing produces.
John Ford
Director
1 film together · 6.7 avg MV
One film, but the kind that reorganises how a performer is cast afterwards.
Best film together
Mister RobertsRaoul Walsh
Director
1 film together · 6.6 avg MV
One film, but the kind that reorganises how a performer is cast afterwards.
Best film together
Objective, Burma!Allan Dwan
Director
1 film together · 6.4 avg MV
One film, but the kind that reorganises how a performer is cast afterwards.
Best film together
Sands of Iwo JimaNathan Juran
Director
1 film together · 5.5 avg MV
One film, but the kind that reorganises how a performer is cast afterwards.
Best film together
Attack of the 50 Foot WomanSix degrees
Follow the thread outward — director, film, co-star, and the film after that.
Categories of our own
Six editorial categories we apply to every performer we cover.
Most rewatchable
Mister Roberts
as Olson
The one that survives a fourth viewing. Nothing in the performance depends on surprise, which is why it keeps paying out.
Most emotional performance
Sands of Iwo Jima
as Marine (uncredited)
Grief played at conversational volume. The film never asks the audience to cry; the performance simply makes it difficult not to.
Most influential performance
Mister Roberts
as Olson
You can hear this reading in other actors' auditions a decade later — the surest measure of influence there is.
Best ensemble performance
Sands of Iwo Jima
as Marine (uncredited)
Work that makes everyone else in the frame better without ever pulling the camera towards itself.
Career defining performance
Mister Roberts
as Olson
If the career had to be argued in a single scene, our editors would pick one from this film and rest the case.
In their films' words
“You can build a whole film around a performer who knows when not to speak. William Hudson has known it for a long time.”
Head to head
Put two careers on the same scale and see where the argument actually sits.
Ours alone
Recognitions handed out by this desk, on criteria no awards body uses.
Drama Legend
Awarded
4 catalogue titles in drama, each one a reference point for the films that followed.
Our desk
Best ending, best opening, best twist and the rest — categories we apply to everyone we cover.
Best ending
Mister Roberts
as Olson
The last five minutes reorganise everything before them, and hold up when you already know what's coming.
Best opening
Objective, Burma!
as Fred Hollis
A first sequence that states the rules of the film without explaining a single one of them.
Most emotional
Sands of Iwo Jima
as Marine (uncredited)
The film where the technique steps aside and lets the feeling arrive undefended.
Best twist
Mister Roberts
as Olson
A reversal earned by information the film gave you and trusted you to misread.
Best visual achievement
Objective, Burma!
as Fred Hollis
Images that would survive with the sound switched off.
Best action sequence
Objective, Burma!
as Fred Hollis
Geography, stakes and consequence held in the same frame — spectacle you can follow.
Best dialogue
Mister Roberts
as Olson
Lines written to be spoken, staged so the pauses do half the work.
Most underrated film
Attack of the 50 Foot Woman
as Harry Archer
The public vote sits below ours on this one, and the direction is the reason for the gap.
If you like this performer
Michael Caine
Built a career in the same territory: adventure and drama
David Krumholtz
Built a career in the same territory: action and adventure
Léa Seydoux
Built a career in the same territory: adventure and drama
Edward Norton
Built a career in the same territory: comedy and adventure
Harvey Keitel
Built a career in the same territory: comedy and adventure
Tom Wilkinson
Built a career in the same territory: comedy and adventure
Have your say
Community
Which William Hudson performance holds up best?
Our readers argue about this one. Make your case, or read the ranked debate already in progress.
Join the conversation
Reference
Continue exploring
Trending performers
Directors they work with
Collections to read next
